GrowthFix Citations

引力経営の理論基盤
── 主要参考文献 260 件

累計被引用 45,000+ cites の 3 引力対称構造(個人引力・組織引力・継続引力)10 本柱を中核に、 Bandura 効力感理論・心理的契約論(Rousseau)・組織コミットメント(Meyer-Allen)・Job Embeddedness(Mitchell)・ 組織開発・社会化・採用面接・評価制度・中間経営職・日本市場・AI ネイティブ・介入研究 RCT を横断的に編集。 「優秀人材が躍動する会社をつくる」という目標に対して、主要研究を踏まえたサービス設計を提供する根拠。

260 参考文献
45,000+ 3 引力対称構造 10 本柱 累計 cites
10 サービス設計軸
11 RCT / 介入研究

Gravity の 3 引力対称構造 ── 10 本柱(主要参考文献)

個人引力 × 組織引力 × 継続引力の 3 階層構造を構成する 10 本柱。被引用降順。累計被引用 45,000+ cites。

PILLAR 01 ── 心理的安全性

Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams

Edmondson, A. (1999). Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.

8,098 cites Cultivate C-2 Scan

doi:10.2307/2666999

「リスクを取って発言しても安全」という認知が組織学習を媒介する。トップダウン制御型運営では達成できない、発議が生まれる組織の理論基盤。

PILLAR 02 ── Voice × リーダーシップ

Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open?

Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884.

1,630 cites Cultivate C-2

doi:10.5465/amj.2007.26279183

「ドアを開けているだけでは Voice は出ない」── 6,000 人超調査で実証。1on1 設計の必要性の決定的根拠。

PILLAR 03 ── アルゴリズム管理

Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control

Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410.

1,517 cites Cultivate C-3 AI × 引力

doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0174

「AI は管理を自動化するが、引力は人が設計する」── AM が代替できない経営職の役割を AOM Annals が裏付け。

PILLAR 04 ── 内発動機 × 外的インセンティブ

Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis

Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980–1008.

1,354 cites Cultivate C-1 CODE

doi:10.1037/a0035661

40 年・183 研究のメタ分析。「質的業績は内発動機が最も予測する」── 金銭インセンティブ偏重では達成できない、質的業績の理論基盤。

PILLAR 05 ── AI × 人事データ

Artificial intelligence in human resources management: Challenges and a path forward

Tambe, P., Cappelli, P., & Yakubovich, V. (2019). California Management Review, 61(4), 15–42.

1,048 cites Cultivate C-3 Recruit R-2

doi:10.1177/0008125619867910

「People Analytics の本質は因果推論であり、可視化ではない」── Wharton 系最高水準誌 CMR が 4 大障壁を定式化。

PILLAR 06 ── 金銭インセンティブ

Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research

Jenkins, G. D., Jr., Mitra, A., Gupta, N., & Shaw, J. D. (1998). Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(5), 777–787.

543 cites Cultivate C-1

doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.777

「金銭インセンティブはタスク量に効くが質には効かない」(質 r=.07・量 r=.34)── 量偏重評価では捉えられない、人材の質を扱う理論基盤。

PILLAR 07 ── HPWS × 日本組織

An empirical examination of the mechanisms mediating between high-performance work systems and the performance of Japanese organizations

Takeuchi, R., Lepak, D. P., Wang, H., & Takeuchi, K. (2007). Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1069–1083.

707 cites Cultivate C-3 日本市場

doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1069

「HPWS 効果は信頼気候(Concern for Employees)を通じて発現する」── ルール明確化単独では機能しない、日本市場固有の HR 設計の実証研究(JAP 掲載・日本 76 事業所実証)。

PILLAR 08 ── 心理的契約論(継続引力 1/3)

Psychological and implied contracts in organizations

Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121–139.

7,483 cites Orbit / 継続伴走 継続引力

doi:10.1007/BF01384942

明示的契約を超えた「暗黙の期待束」が雇用関係を支配する。Relational / Transactional / Balanced の 3 類型 + 契約違反(Breach / Violation)が離職予測の核。Quarterly 心理的契約再校正の理論基盤。後継研究:Tomprou-Rousseau-Hansen 2015 Post-Violation Model(被引用 277)+ Rousseau-Hansen-Tomprou 2018 動的位相モデル(被引用 488)。

PILLAR 09 ── 組織コミットメント 3 成分(継続引力 2/3)

A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. + Meyer-Allen-Smith (1993) JAP 系列 + Meyer, Stanley, Herscovitch, & Topolnytsky (2002) Journal of Vocational Behavior meta(n=50,146・被引用 3,351)

13,777 cites(系列累積) Orbit / 月次設計 継続引力

doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z

情緒的(Affective・愛着)/ 継続的(Continuance・損失計算)/ 規範的(Normative・義務感)の 3 成分分解。Meyer 2002 メタ(n=50,146)で Affective × 業績 r=+.16 vs Continuance × 業績 r=-.07(負相関)+ Continuance × ストレス r=+.20 を実証。給料偏重では達成できない、Affective 主軸の理論基盤。

PILLAR 10 ── Job Embeddedness(継続引力 3/3)

Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover

Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102–1121.

2,707 cites Orbit / 軸 15 個ゲート 継続引力

doi:10.5465/3069391

「なぜ辞めるか」ではなく「なぜ辞めないか」を Links × Fit × Sacrifice の 3 次元 + 組織内 / 組織外の 2 領域 = 6 領域 Matrix で測定。満足度・コミットメントを統制してもなお実離職を予測する独立変数。Orbit 月次パルスサーベイ(Crossley 2007 短縮 7 項目尺度・α=.88)+ 軸 15 個ゲートの構造的根拠。

補完軸 ── 産業界・公的機関の一次データレポート

3 引力対称構造 10 本柱(査読付き学術論文)を補完する、AI ネイティブ時代の一次データソース。査読論文ではないが、一次データとして高い信頼性を持つもののみを厳選掲載。

S1 / AI 露出度実測

Anthropic Economic Index: Labor Market Impacts of AI

Anthropic. (2026). Anthropic Economic Index Report. (一次データレポート・査読外)

一次データ Cultivate Recruit 中間経営職 AI ネイティブ

anthropic.com/economic-index

Claude 利用データから職種別「Observed Exposure(観察された露出度・0-100pt)」を実測した一次データレポート。主要数値:① AI 露出度高職種は平均年収 47% 高・大学院卒 4.5 倍(高学歴・高給デスクワーク層が AI と最初に重なる)/② 22-25 歳若年労働者の AI 露出度高職種で新規採用 14% 減速/③ 理論上 AI 処理可能 97% に対し実カバー率は職種別大ばらつき(プログラマー 75% / 調理師 0%)/④ BLS 雇用予測で露出度 10pt 上昇あたり 2034 年成長率 0.6pt 低下。**中間経営職(Raelin 4 条件)の時代的必然性を一次データで実証する補完エビデンス**。

サービス別 主要論文

フィルターでサービス軸を絞り込めます。被引用降順で主要論文を表示。

The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262–274. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262

2,589 cites Recruit R-2

A meta-analytic investigation of the impact of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview

Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x

3,698 cites Recruit R-1

The structured employment interview: Narrative and quantitative review of the research literature

Levashina, J., Hartwell, C. J., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2014). Personnel Psychology, 67(1), 241–293. doi:10.1111/peps.12052

354 cites Recruit R-2

The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis

McDaniel, M. A., Whetzel, D. L., Schmidt, F. L., & Maurer, S. D. (1994). Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 599–616. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.599

462 cites Recruit R-2

Signaling theory: A review and assessment

Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2010). Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. doi:10.1177/0149206310388419

4,189 cites Recruit R-3

Captivating company: Dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding

Berthon, P., Ewing, M., & Hah, L. L. (2005). International Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 151–172. doi:10.1080/02650487.2005.11072912

706 cites Recruit R-3

Organizational socialization: Its content and consequences

Feldman, D. C. (1976). Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(3), 309–318.

— cites Recruit R-4

Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings

Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259–293. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x

2,452 cites Recruit R-5

Surveying the forest: A meta-analysis, moderator investigation, and future-oriented discussion of the antecedents of voluntary employee turnover

Rubenstein, A. L., Eberly, M. B., Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (2017). Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 1–63. doi:10.1111/peps.12226

379 cites Recruit R-5

Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover

Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102–1121.

2,707 cites Recruit R-5 Orbit

Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs

Huffcutt, A. I., & Arthur, W., Jr. (1994). Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 184–190. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.184

325 cites Recruit R-2

The ASA framework: An update

Schneider, B. (1987). Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437–454.

3,231 cites Recruit R-1 Scan

The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254

3,868 cites Cultivate C-1

Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705

5,027 cites Cultivate C-1

Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context

Theeboom, T., Beersma, B., & van Vianen, A. E. M. (2014). The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/17439760.2013.837499

547 cites Cultivate C-2 Coaching

Psychological safety: A meta-analytic review and extension

Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017). Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 113–165. doi:10.1111/peps.12183

849 cites Cultivate C-2

Safety First: Psychological Safety as the Key to AI Transformation

Lin, et al. (2026). arxiv preprint, 2602.23279. arxiv:2602.23279

n=2,257(2026 最新) Cultivate C-2 AI ネイティブ

Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement

Saks, A. M. (2006). Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619. doi:10.1108/02683940610690169

3,206 cites Cultivate C-3 Scan

The job demands-resources model: State of the art

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. doi:10.1108/02683940710733115

9,050 cites Cultivate C-3

Organizational routines as a source of continuous change

Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Organization Science, 14(2), 94–111. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.2.94.14992

2,718 cites Cultivate C-4

Strategic decisions and all that jazz

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Business Strategy Review. doi related

3,209 cites Cultivate C-4

The middle management perspective on strategy process: Contributions, synthesis, and future research directions

Wooldridge, B., Schmid, T., & Floyd, S. W. (2008). Journal of Management, 34(6), 1190–1221. doi:10.1177/0149206308324326

469 cites Cultivate C-5

Middle managers' emotional intelligence and change competence: A study of change leaders

Huy, Q. N. (2002). Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 31–69.

770 cites Cultivate C-5

Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory over 25 years

Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5

5,050 cites Cultivate C-2

Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership

Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001

3,865 cites Coaching CODE

Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure

Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126. doi:10.1177/0149206307308913

2,057 cites Coaching CODE

Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change

Bandura, A. (1977). Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

49,507 cites Coaching 思想層

Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings

Smither, J. W., London, M., & Reilly, R. R. (2005). Personnel Psychology, 58(1), 33–66. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.514_1.x

365 cites Coaching Cultivate C-1

Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover

Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102–1121.

2,707 cites Orbit Recruit R-5

Turnover under good or bad economic conditions: A test of two adaptation-level theory predictions

Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 327–331.

2,514 cites Orbit Recruit R-5

Increasing human and social capital by applying job embeddedness theory

Holtom, B. C., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T. W., & Inderrieden, E. J. (2006). Organizational Dynamics, 35(4), 316–331. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2006.08.007

206 cites Orbit Recruit R-5

Employee socialization revisited: Psychological contract fulfillment and implications for retention

Allen, D. G. (2006). Journal of Applied Psychology.

— cites Orbit Recruit R-4

Integrating ML and explainable AI for employee attrition prediction (SHAP / XAI)

Nature Scientific Reports (2026). Scientific Reports, s41598-026-36424-2. nature.com

2026 新規 Orbit AI ネイティブ

The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior

Barsade, S. G. (2002). Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644–675. doi:10.2307/3094912

2,478 cites Scan CODE

Emotional contagion

Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1993). Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 96–99.

1,693 cites Scan CODE

The ASA framework: An update

Schneider, B. (1987). Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437–454.

3,231 cites Scan Recruit R-1

Cognitive, affective, and motivational processes and performance: A meta-analytic review

Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342.

3,698 cites Scan Recruit R-1

Exercise of collective efficacy in changing societies

Bandura, A. (2000). In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge University Press.

1,721 cites Scan 思想層

Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change

Bandura, A. (1977). Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

49,507 cites 思想層

Collective efficacy and neighborhood violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy theory

Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Science, 277(5328), 918–924. doi:10.1126/science.277.5328.918

8,583 cites 思想層

Information, incentives and bargaining in the Japanese economy

Aoki, M. (1988). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571701

756 cites 思想層 日本市場

Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance

Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K. H. (2011). Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 127–152. doi:10.1002/hrdq.20070

1,289 cites 思想層 Cultivate

Work engagement in Japan: Validation of the Japanese version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale

Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W. B., Kosugi, S., et al. (2008). Applied Psychology, 57(3), 510–523. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00333.x

395 cites 思想層 日本市場 Scan

完全リスト 263 件

領域別(v7.1 章立て順・260513 更新)。Ctrl+F で検索可能。被引用数は Crossref / OpenAlex 確認済。

完全リスト 260 件を展開(Ctrl+F 検索可)+ Phase 12-14 補強 3 件(Crossley 2007 / Tomprou 2015 / Rousseau-Hansen-Tomprou 2018)
# 著者(年) タイトル(短縮) 誌・出版 被引用 DOI
1Vansteenkiste & Ryan (2013)Psychological growth and vulnerability – SDTJ. Psychotherapy Integration2,044linkSDT / CODE
2Vallerand & Losier (1999)Integrative analysis: intrinsic & extrinsic motivation in sportJ. Applied Sport Psychology710linkSDT / CODE
3Tremblay et al. (2009)Work Extrinsic & Intrinsic Motivation ScaleCan. J. Behavioural Science556linkSDT / CODE
4Di Domenico & Ryan (2017)Neuroscience of Intrinsic MotivationFrontiers Human Neuroscience531linkSDT / CODE
5Deci et al. (1991)Motivation and Education: SDT perspectiveEducational Psychologist2,012linkSDT / CODE
6Noels et al. (2000)Why Are You Learning a Second Language? SDTLanguage Learning1,205linkSDT
7Saks (2006)Antecedents and consequences of employee engagementJ. Managerial Psychology3,206linkC-3 / Scan
8Schneider (1987)The ASA framework: An updatePersonnel Psychology3,231R-1 / Scan
9Kristof-Brown et al. (2005)P-O Fit meta-analysisPersonnel Psychology3,698linkR-1 / Scan
10Barsade (2002)The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and group behaviorAdministrative Science Quarterly2,478 / 約 4,800linkI / Scan / CODE
11Hatfield et al. (1993)Emotional contagionCurrent Directions Psych. Science1,693I / CODE
12Bandura (2000)Exercise of collective efficacySelf-efficacy in changing societies (Ed.)1,721E / Scan
13Mathieu et al. (2008)Team effectiveness: A review and meta-analysisPsychological Bulletin1,578E
14Goddard et al. (2000)Collective efficacy and student achievementAmerican Educational Research J.839E
15Kellogg et al. (2020)Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of controlAcademy of Management Annals1,517linkV / C-3 / C-5
16Tambe et al. (2019)AI in HRM: Challenges and a path forwardCalifornia Management Review1,048linkT-PA / C-3 / R-2
17Bandura (1977)Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral changePsychological Review49,507linkD / Coaching / 思想層
18Sampson et al. (1997)Neighborhoods and violent crime: Collective efficacyScience8,583linkF / 思想層
19Stajkovic & Luthans (1998)SE meta-analysis organizational settingsPsychological Bulletin2,210D
20Avolio & Gardner (2005)Authentic leadership developmentLeadership Quarterly3,865linkH / Coaching / CODE
21Walumbwa et al. (2008)Authentic leadership: Development and validation of ALQJournal of Management2,057linkH / Coaching / CODE
22Schmidt & Hunter (1998)Validity and utility of selection methods (85 yr meta)Psychological Bulletin2,589linkJ / R-2
23Levashina et al. (2014)Structured employment interview: Narrative & quantitative reviewPersonnel Psychology354linkJ / R-2
24McDaniel et al. (1994)Validity of employment interviews: Comprehensive meta-analysisJournal of Applied Psychology462linkJ / R-2
25Huffcutt & Arthur (1994)Interview validity for entry-level jobsJournal of Applied Psychology325linkJ / R-2
26Cable & Judge (1997)Interviewers' perceptions of P-O fit and selection decisionsJournal of Applied Psychology435linkJ / R-1 / R-2
27Macan (2009)Employment interview: A review of current studiesHuman Resource Management Review172linkJ / R-2
28Locke & Latham (2002)Goal setting and task motivation: 35-year odysseyAmerican Psychologist5,027linkK / C-1
29Locke & Latham (2006)New directions in goal-setting theoryCurrent Directions Psych. Science1,138linkK / C-1
30Cerasoli et al. (2014)Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives: 40-year metaPsychological Bulletin1,354linkK / C-1
31Jenkins et al. (1998)Financial incentives and performance: Meta-analytic reviewJournal of Applied Psychology543linkK / C-1
32Smither et al. (2005)Does performance improve following multisource feedback?Personnel Psychology365linkK / C-1
33Kluger & DeNisi (1996)Effects of feedback interventions: 131-yr meta-analysisPsychological Bulletin3,868linkT介入 / C-1
34Feldman & Pentland (2003)Organizational routines as a source of continuous changeOrganization Science2,718linkL / C-4
35Eisenhardt (1989)Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environmentsAcademy of Management Journal3,209L / C-4
36Feldman (2000)Organizational routines as a source of continuous changeOrganization Science1,273L / C-4
37Connelly et al. (2010)Signaling theory: A review and assessmentJournal of Management4,189linkN / R-3
38Berthon et al. (2005)Captivating company: Dimensions of attractiveness in employer brandingInternational Journal of Advertising706linkX / R-3
39Lievens & Highhouse (2003)Instrumental and symbolic attributes and employer attractivenessPersonnel Psychology576linkX / R-3
40Turban & Cable (2003)Firm reputation and applicant pool characteristicsJ. Organizational Behavior424linkX / R-3
41Backhaus & Tikoo (2004)Conceptualizing and researching employer brandingCareer Development International882N / R-3
42Graen & Uhl-Bien (1995)Relationship-based approach to leadership: LMX theory (25 yr)Leadership Quarterly5,050linkO / C-2
43Edmondson (1999)Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teamsAdministrative Science Quarterly8,098linkO / C-2 / C-3
44Detert & Burris (2007)Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open?Academy of Management Journal1,630linkO / C-2
45Morrison (2014)Employee voice and silenceAnnual Review of Organizational Psychology1,189O / C-2
46Gerstner & Day (1997)Meta-analytic review of LMX theoryJournal of Applied Psychology1,932O / C-2
47Huy (2002)Middle managers' emotional intelligence and change competenceAcademy of Management Journal770P / C-5
48Floyd & Wooldridge (1992)Middle management involvement in strategy: Roles and implicationsStrategic Management Journal470P / C-5
49Wooldridge et al. (2008)Middle management perspective on strategy processJournal of Management469linkX / C-5
50Wooldridge & Floyd (1990)The strategy process, middle management involvement, and performanceStrategic Management Journal592linkX / C-5
51Rouleau & Balogun (2011)Middle managers, strategic sensemaking, and discursive competenceJournal of Management Studies445linkX / C-5
52Tett & Meyer (1993)Job satisfaction, commitment, turnover intention – path analysesPersonnel Psychology2,452linkX / R-5
53Mitchell et al. (2001)Why people stay: Job embeddednessAcademy of Management Journal2,707Q / R-5 / Orbit
54Griffeth et al. (2000)A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnoverJournal of Management2,514Q / R-5
55Mobley (1977)Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnoverJournal of Applied Psychology1,374Q / R-5
56Rubenstein et al. (2017)Antecedents of voluntary employee turnover: Meta-analysisPersonnel Psychology379linkX / R-5
57Holtom et al. (2006)Increasing human and social capital by applying job embeddednessOrganizational Dynamics206linkX / R-5 / Orbit
58Kammeyer-Mueller & Wanberg (2003)Unwrapping the organizational entry processJournal of Applied Psychology426linkX / R-5 / R-4
59Theeboom et al. (2014)Does coaching work? Meta-analysis (18 studies / 1,629 participants)J. Positive Psychology547linkT介入 / C-2
60Luthans et al. (2006)Psychological capital development: micro-interventionJ. Organizational Behavior1,000linkT介入 / C-5
61Luthans et al. (2008)Web-based training intervention to develop PsyCap (RCT)Academy of Management Learning & Education650linkT介入 / C-5
62Avey et al. (2011)Meta-analysis: Impact of positive psychological capitalHuman Resource Development Quarterly1,289linkT介入 / 思想層
63Frazier et al. (2017)Psychological safety: Meta-analytic review and extensionPersonnel Psychology849linkT介入 / C-2
64van den Heuvel et al. (2015)The job crafting intervention: Effects on job resources (RCT)J. Occupational & Organizational Psychology306linkT介入 / C-2
65Gruman & Saks (2011)Performance management and employee engagementHuman Resource Management Review454linkT介入 / C-1
66McNatt & Judge (2008)Self-efficacy intervention, job attitudes, and turnover (field exp)Human Relations88linkT介入 / R-5
67Nielsen et al. (2010)Conducting organizational-level OHP interventions: What works?Work & Stress294linkT介入 / C-3
68Latham & Locke (1979)Goal setting – A motivational technique that works (field exp)Organizational Dynamics200linkT介入 / C-1
69Aoki (1988)Information, incentives and bargaining in the Japanese economyCambridge University Press756linkW / 思想層
70Morishima (1991)Information sharing and firm performance in JapanIndustrial Relations61linkW / C-2
71Morishima (1995)Embedding HRM in a social contextBritish Journal of Industrial Relations50linkW / 思想層
72Kato & Morishima (2002)Productivity effects of participatory employment practices (Japan panel)Industrial Relations107linkW / C-3
73Takeuchi et al. (2007)HPWS and performance of Japanese organizations (JAP)Journal of Applied Psychology707linkW / C-3 / 思想層
74Takeuchi et al. (2009)HPWS effects on employees' attitudes (Japan cross-level)Personnel Psychology438linkW / C-3
75Shimazu et al. (2008)Work engagement in Japan: Validation of Japanese UWESApplied Psychology395linkW / C-3 / Scan
76Marler & Boudreau (2017)Evidence-based review of HR analyticsInternational J. HRM585linkT-PA / C-3
77Rasmussen & Ulrich (2015)Learning from practice: How HR analytics avoids being a management fadOrganizational Dynamics239linkT-PA / C-5
78van den Heuvel & Bondarouk (2017)The rise (and fall?) of HR analyticsJ. Organizational Effectiveness161linkT-PA / C-3
79Upadhyay & Khandelwal (2018)Applying artificial intelligence: Implications for recruitmentStrategic HR Review248linkU / R-2
80Raghavan et al. (2020)Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiringACM FAccT542linkU / R-2
81Van Maanen & Schein (1979)Toward a theory of organizational socializationResearch in Organizational BehaviorA / R-4
82Jones (1986)Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers' adjustmentsAcademy of Management JournalA / R-4
83Saks & Gruman (2018)Socialization resources theoryGroup & Organization Management101A / R-4
84Bauer (2024)Organizational socialization: Meta-analysis update35A / R-4
85Cooper-Thomas & Anderson (2006)Organizational socialization: A field studyJ. Vocational Behavior177A / R-4
86Kotter (1996)Leading changeHarvard Business School Press467B / 全般
87Beer & Nohria (2000)Cracking the code of change (Theory E vs O)Harvard Business ReviewB / 全般
88Bushe & Marshak (2009)Revisioning organization development: Diagnostic and dialogic premisesJ. Applied Behavioral Science252B
89Bakker & Demerouti (2007)The job demands-resources model: State of the artJ. Managerial Psychology9,050linkR / C-3
90Allen (2006)Socialization tactics + job embeddednessJ. Applied Psychology349S / R-4 / Orbit
91Sluss & Thompson (2012)LMX × socialization: Role-based approachJ. Applied Psychology104S / R-4
92Bandura (2000)Exercise of collective efficacy in changing societiesSelf-efficacy in changing societies (Ed.)1,721E / Scan
93Tasa & Taggar (2007)Collective efficacy and team performanceJ. Applied Psychology232E
94Vansteenkiste & Ryan (2013)Psychological growth and vulnerability – SDT needsJ. Psychotherapy Integration2,044linkSDT / CODE
95Vallerand & Losier (1999)Intrinsic & extrinsic motivation in sportJ. Applied Sport Psychology710linkSDT / CODE
96Tremblay et al. (2009)Work Extrinsic & Intrinsic Motivation Scale (WEIMS)Can. J. Behavioural Science556linkSDT / CODE
97Di Domenico & Ryan (2017)Neuroscience of intrinsic motivationFrontiers Human Neuroscience531linkSDT / CODE
98Deci et al. (1991)Motivation and education: SDT perspectiveEducational Psychologist2,012linkSDT / CODE
99Noels et al. (2000)Why are you learning a second language? SDTLanguage Learning1,205linkSDT
100Van Maanen (1978)People processing: Strategies of organizational socializationOrganizational Dynamics242linkA / R-4
101Van Maanen (1975)Police socialization: Longitudinal examination of job attitudesAdministrative Science Quarterly507linkA / R-4
102Bauer et al. (2007)Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: Meta-analysisJournal of Applied Psychology1,423linkA / R-4
103Morrison (1993)Newcomer information seeking: Types, modes, sources, outcomesAcademy of Management Journal728linkA / R-4
104Ellis et al. (2017)Newcomer adjustment and managers' perception of proactive behaviorJournal of Applied Psychology149linkA / R-4
105Gruman et al. (2006)Socialization tactics and newcomer proactive behaviorsJournal of Vocational Behavior230linkA / R-4
106Saks et al. (2011)Neglected role of proactive behavior in newcomer socializationJournal of Vocational Behavior107linkA / R-4
107Saks & Gruman (2018)Socialization resources theory and newcomers' work engagementCareer Development International101linkA / R-4
108Saks & Gruman (2011a)Getting newcomers engaged: Role of socialization tacticsJournal of Managerial Psychology90linkA / R-4
109Saks & Gruman (2012)Getting newcomers on board: Socialization resources theory reviewOxford Handbook of Org. Socialization76linkA / R-4
110Cooper-Thomas & Anderson (2005)Organizational socialization: Field study into socialization successInternational J. Selection and Assessment59linkA / R-4
111Schein & Van Maanen (2016)Career anchors and job/role planningOrganizational Dynamics39linkA / R-4
112Saks & Gruman (2014)Making organizations more effective through socializationJournal of Organizational Effectiveness39linkA / R-4
113Saks & Gruman (2011b)Organizational socialization and positive organizational behaviourCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences54linkA / R-4
114Gruman & Saks (2011b)Socialization preferences and intentions: One size fit all?Journal of Vocational Behavior28linkA / R-4
115Benzinger (2016)Socialization tactics and newcomer info seeking – contingent workforcePersonnel Review22linkA / R-4
116Marshak & Bushe (2009)Reflections on diagnostic and dialogic ODJournal of Applied Behavioral Science13linkB
117Bushe & Marshak (2014a)The dialogic mindset in organization developmentResearch in Org. Change & Development66linkB
118Bushe & Marshak (2014b)Dialogic organization developmentNTL Handbook of OD and Change26linkB
119Bushe & Marshak (2015)Dialogic OD approach to transformation and changePracticing Organization Development20linkB
120Beckhard (1959)Helping a group with planned change: A case studyJournal of Social Issues4linkB
121Sminia & Van Nistelrooij (2006)Strategic management and OD: Planned change in public sectorJournal of Change Management52linkB
122Kotter (2009)Leading change: Why transformation efforts failOrganizational Change, Leadership & Ethics27linkB
123Mouazen & Hernández-Lara (2023)Transformational leaders and Kotter change modelSustainability27linkB
124Cooperrider et al. (2017)Appreciative inquiry: 30 years of reflectionsResearch in Org. Change & Development51linkB
125Stavros et al. (2015)Appreciative inquiryPracticing Organization Development30linkB
126Cooperrider (2013)Contemporary commentary on appreciative inquiryOrganizational Generativity29linkB
127Grieten et al. (2018)Inquiring into appreciative inquiry: Conversation with CooperriderJournal of Management Inquiry33linkB
128Beer & Nohria (2009)Cracking the code of change: Theory E vs OOrganizational Change, Leadership & Ethics26linkB
129Caldwell (2012)Systems thinking, organizational change and Senge critiqueJournal of Change Management63linkB
130Raelin & Cataldo (2011)Middle management empowerment and failure of changeJournal of Change Management28linkB
131Zhang & Rajagopalan (2010)CEO origin, strategic change, and firm performanceStrategic Management Journal445linkC
132Zajac (1990)CEO selection, succession, compensation and firm performanceStrategic Management Journal354linkC
133Haque et al. (2022)Insider vs outsider CEO and firm performance: COVID-19 evidenceFinance Research Letters28linkC
134Jalal & Prezas (2012)Outsider CEO succession and firm performanceJournal of Economics and Business22linkC
135Handler (1994)Succession in family business: Review of the researchFamily Business Review513linkC
136Lansberg (1988)The succession conspiracyFamily Business Review405linkC
137Chua et al. (2003)Succession and nonsuccession concerns of family firmsFamily Business Review341linkC
138Sharma et al. (2003)Succession planning as planned behavior: Empirical resultsFamily Business Review327linkC
139Brockhaus (2004)Family business succession: Suggestions for future researchFamily Business Review208linkC
140Barach & Ganitsky (1995)Successful succession in family businessFamily Business Review192linkC
141Molly et al. (2010)Family business succession and financial structure/performanceFamily Business Review56linkC
142Bligh (2006)Post-merger culture clash: Cultural leadershipLeadership41linkC
143Karaevli (2007)CEO outsiderness and performance: Moderating contextsStrategic Management Journal269linkC
144Schepker et al. (2017)CEO succession, strategic change, performance: Meta-analysisLeadership Quarterly177linkC
145De Massis et al. (2008)Factors preventing intra-family successionFamily Business Review497linkC
146Cartwright & Schoenberg (2006)Thirty years of M&A research: Advances and opportunitiesBritish Journal of Management448linkC
147Marks & Mirvis (2011)Merge ahead: Research agenda for M&A successJournal of Business and Psychology63linkC
148Ayres (1990)Rough family justice: Equity in succession planningFamily Business Review47linkC
149Blumentritt et al. (2013)Game theory and family business successionFamily Business Review46linkC
150Hubler (1999)Ten obstacles to family-business succession planningFamily Business Review21linkC
151Bower (2018)Succession management (Palgrave Encyclopedia)Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic ManagementlinkC
152Cappelli (2011)Succession planning (APA Handbook chapter)APA Handbook I/O Psychology vol.34linkC
153Bandura (1978)Self-efficacy: ABRT continuationAdvances in Behaviour Research & Therapy1,251linkD / 思想層
154Bandura & Adams (1977)Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral changeCognitive Therapy and Research1,016linkD / 思想層
155Stajkovic & Luthans (1998b)Social cognitive theory and self-efficacy: Beyond traditional approachesOrganizational Dynamics511linkD / 思想層
156Stajkovic et al. (2009)Collective efficacy, group potency, performance: Meta-analysesJournal of Applied Psychology333linkE / Scan
157Taggar & Seijts (2003)Leader & staff role-efficacy as antecedents of collective efficacyHuman Performance53linkE / Coaching
158Earls et al. (2007)Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN dataset)ICPSRlinkF / 思想層
159Taras et al. (2010)Hofstede cultural value dimensions: 30-yr multilevel meta-analysisJournal of Applied Psychology1,096linkG / 反論
160Anderson & West (1998)Team climate inventory: Development and validationJournal of Organizational Behavior1,855linkG / 反論
161Ikemi (2005)Rogers and Gendlin on the bodily felt sensePerson-Centered & Experiential Psychotherapies16linkCoaching
162Jones et al. (2015)Effectiveness of workplace coaching: Meta-analysisJ. Occupational & Organizational Psychology561linkCoaching
163Fuchs & Koch (2014)Embodied affectivity: On moving and being movedFrontiers in Psychology375linkCoaching
164Dyrbye et al. (2019)Professional coaching intervention for physician well-being (RCT)JAMA Internal Medicine289linkCoaching
165Gerstner et al. (2013)CEO narcissism, audience engagement, and technological adoptionAdministrative Science Quarterly416link翻訳機構
166Carpenter et al. (2004)Upper echelons research revisited: TMT compositionJournal of Management2,179link翻訳機構
167Norburn & Birley (1988)Top management team and corporate performanceStrategic Management Journal367link翻訳機構
168Hsu & Lim (2013)Knowledge brokering and organizational innovation: Founder imprintingOrganization Science109link翻訳機構
169Lewis et al. (2013)CEO characteristics and firm environmental disclosureStrategic Management Journal660link翻訳機構
170Frese & Gielnik (2014)Psychology of entrepreneurshipAnnual Review of Org. Psychology & Org. Behavior900link翻訳機構
171Budhwar et al. (2023)HRM in the age of generative AI: ChatGPT perspectivesHuman Resource Management Journal726linkAI / C-3
172Acemoğlu & Restrepo (2018)Artificial intelligence, automation and workNational Bureau of Economic Research646linkAI
173Acemoğlu et al. (2022)Artificial intelligence and jobs: Evidence from online vacanciesJournal of Labor Economics833linkAI
174Brynjolfsson et al. (2023)Generative AI at work (productivity study)National Bureau of Economic Research792linkAI
175Brynjolfsson et al. (2017)AI and the modern productivity paradoxNational Bureau of Economic Research727linkAI
176Grace et al. (2018)When will AI exceed human performance? Evidence from AI expertsJournal of Artificial Intelligence Research548linkAI
177Baker et al. (2005)Expertise in ultra-endurance triathletes: Deliberate practice theoryJ. Applied Sport Psychology200linkCODE / 能力輪
178Ericsson (2004)Deliberate practice and expert performance in medicineAcademic Medicine2,926linkCODE / 能力輪
179Yeager et al. (2019)National experiment: Growth mindset improves achievement (RCT)Nature1,426linkCODE
180Grenier et al. (2005)Intolerance of uncertainty and ambiguity: Similarities & differencesPersonality and Individual Differences322linkNC / Coaching
181Furnham & Marks (2013)Tolerance of ambiguity: Review of the recent literaturePsychology418linkNC / Coaching
182McLain et al. (2015)Ambiguity tolerance in organizations: Definitional clarificationFrontiers in Psychology109linkNC / Coaching
183Collings & Mellahi (2009)Strategic talent management: Review and research agendaHuman Resource Management Review1,758link事業中心人事
184Guest (2017)HRM and employee well-being: Toward a new analytic frameworkHuman Resource Management Journal1,217link事業中心人事
185Alfes et al. (2012)HRM practices, engagement and employee behaviour: Moderated mediationInternational J. of HRM752link事業中心人事
186Paauwe (2008)HRM and performance: Achievements, methodological issues & prospectsJournal of Management Studies724link事業中心人事
187Stavrou et al. (2010)HRM and firm performance in Europe: Best fit vs best practiceInternational J. of HRM103link事業中心人事
188Cable & Judge (1996)P-O fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entryOrg. Behavior and Human Decision Processes1,187linkM / R-1
189Cable & Judge (1997)Interviewers' perceptions of P-O fit and selection decisionsJournal of Applied Psychology435linkJ / R-1 / R-2
190Phillips (1998)Effects of realistic job previews: Meta-analysisAcademy of Management Journal267linkN / R-3
191Premack & Wanous (1985)Meta-analysis of realistic job preview experimentsJournal of Applied Psychology265linkN / R-3
192Zottoli & Wanous (2000)Recruitment source research: Current status and future directionsHuman Resource Management Review131linkN / R-3
193Lievens & Highhouse (2003)Instrumental and symbolic attributes and employer attractivenessPersonnel Psychology576linkX / R-3
194Berthon et al. (2005)Captivating company: Employer brand attractiveness dimensionsInternational Journal of Advertising706linkX / R-3
195Turban & Cable (2003)Firm reputation and applicant pool characteristicsJournal of Organizational Behavior424linkX / R-3
196Tett & Meyer (1993)Job satisfaction, commitment, turnover: Path analyses (meta)Personnel Psychology2,452linkX / R-5 / C-3
197Kammeyer-Mueller & Wanberg (2003)Unwrapping organizational entry process: Multiple antecedentsJournal of Applied Psychology426linkX / R-5 / R-4
198Rubenstein et al. (2017)Antecedents of voluntary employee turnover: Meta-analysisPersonnel Psychology379linkX / R-5
199Holtom et al. (2006)Increasing human and social capital: Job embeddedness theoryOrganizational Dynamics206linkX / R-5 / Orbit
200Wooldridge et al. (2008)Middle management perspective on strategy process: ReviewJournal of Management469linkX / C-5
201Rouleau & Balogun (2011)Middle managers, strategic sensemaking, discursive competenceJournal of Management Studies445linkX / C-5
202Wooldridge & Floyd (1990)Strategy process, middle management involvement, and performanceStrategic Management Journal592linkX / C-5
203Morishima (1991)Information sharing and firm performance in JapanIndustrial Relations61linkW / C-2
204Morishima (1995)Embedding HRM in a social contextBritish Journal of Industrial Relations50linkW / 思想層
205Kato & Morishima (2002)Productivity effects of participatory employment practices (Japan panel)Industrial Relations107linkW / C-3
206Takeuchi et al. (2007)HPWS and performance of Japanese organizationsJournal of Applied Psychology707linkW / C-3 / 思想層
207Takeuchi et al. (2009)HPWS effects on employees' attitudes (Japan cross-level)Personnel Psychology438linkW / C-3
208Theeboom et al. (2014)Does coaching work? Meta-analysis (18 studies, 1,629 participants)Journal of Positive Psychology547linkT介入 / C-2
209Luthans et al. (2006)Psychological capital development: Micro-interventionJournal of Organizational Behavior1,000linkT介入 / C-5
210Luthans et al. (2008)Web-based training to develop PsyCap (RCT)Academy of Management Learning & Education650linkT介入 / C-5
211Avey et al. (2011)Meta-analysis: Impact of positive psychological capitalHuman Resource Development Quarterly1,289linkT介入 / 思想層
212van den Heuvel et al. (2015)Job crafting intervention: Effects on resources, SE, well-being (RCT)J. Occupational & Organizational Psychology306linkT介入 / C-2
213Kluger & DeNisi (1996)Effects of feedback interventions: 131-year meta-analysisPsychological Bulletin3,868linkT介入 / C-1
214Frazier et al. (2017)Psychological safety: Meta-analytic review and extensionPersonnel Psychology849linkT介入 / C-2
215McNatt & Judge (2008)Self-efficacy intervention, job attitudes, and turnover (field exp)Human Relations88linkT介入 / R-5
216Gruman & Saks (2011c)Performance management and employee engagementHuman Resource Management Review454linkT介入 / C-1
217Nielsen et al. (2010)Conducting org-level OHP interventions: What works?Work & Stress294linkT介入 / C-3
218Latham & Locke (1979)Goal setting – motivational technique that works (field exp)Organizational Dynamics200linkT介入 / C-1
219Tambe et al. (2019)AI in HRM: Challenges and a path forwardCalifornia Management Review1,048linkT-PA / C-3
220Marler & Boudreau (2017)Evidence-based review of HR analyticsInternational J. HRM585linkT-PA / C-3
221van den Heuvel & Bondarouk (2017)The rise (and fall?) of HR analyticsJ. Organizational Effectiveness161linkT-PA / C-3
222Rasmussen & Ulrich (2015)HR analytics: Learning from practice to avoid being a fadOrganizational Dynamics239linkT-PA / C-5
223Upadhyay & Khandelwal (2018)Applying AI: Implications for recruitmentStrategic HR Review248linkU / R-2
224Raghavan et al. (2020)Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiringACM FAccT542linkU / R-2
225Locke & Latham (2006)New directions in goal-setting theoryCurrent Directions Psychological Science1,138linkK / C-1
226Tosi et al. (1991)A theory of goal setting and task performance (book review)Academy of Management Review110linkK / C-1
227Cerasoli et al. (2016)Performance, incentives, and SDT needs: Meta-analysisMotivation and Emotion131linkK / C-1
228Flinchum et al. (2023)One-on-one meetings between managers and direct reportsOrganizational Psychology Review8linkL / C-4 / C-2
229Eisenhardt & Brown (1998)Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaosLong Range Planning298linkL / C-4
230Gerstner & Day (1997)Meta-analytic review of LMX theoryJournal of Applied Psychology1,932linkO / C-2
231Huy (2002)Emotional balancing of continuity and radical change: Middle managersAdministrative Science Quarterly770linkP / C-5
232Floyd & Wooldridge (1992)Middle management involvement in strategy and strategic typeStrategic Management Journal470linkP / C-5
233Floyd & Wooldridge (1994)Dinosaurs or dynamos? Recognizing middle management's strategic roleAcademy of Management Executive118linkP / C-5
234Charan et al. (2001)The leadership pipeline (book, reviewed in AMP)Jossey-Bass / Academy of Management PerspectiveslinkP / C-5
235Mobley (1977)Intermediate linkages: Job satisfaction and employee turnoverJournal of Applied Psychology1,374linkQ / R-5
236Hom et al. (2017)One hundred years of employee turnover theory and researchJournal of Applied Psychology726linkQ / R-5
237Boswell et al. (2005)Job change and satisfaction: The honeymoon-hangover effectJournal of Applied Psychology282linkQ / R-5 / R-4
238Allen (2006)Socialization tactics influence newcomer embeddedness and turnover?Journal of Management349linkS / R-4 / R-5
239Sluss & Thompson (2012)Socializing the newcomer: Mediating role of LMXOrg. Behavior and Human Decision Processes104linkS / R-4 / C-2
240Van Maanen & Schein (1979)Toward a theory of organizational socializationResearch in Organizational BehaviorA / R-4
241Jones (1986)Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers' adjustmentsAcademy of Management JournalA / R-4
242Porras & Patterson (1979)Assessing planned changeGroup & Organization Studies9linkB
243Stajkovic & Luthans (1998a)Self-efficacy and work-related performance: Meta-analysisPsychological Bulletin2,210linkD / 思想層
244Tasa et al. (2007)Development of collective efficacy: Multilevel longitudinal studyJournal of Applied Psychology232linkE / Scan
245Goddard et al. (2000)Collective teacher efficacy: Meaning, measure, impact on achievementAmerican Educational Research Journal839linkE / Scan
246Kellogg et al. (2020)Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of controlAcademy of Management Annals1,517linkV / C-3 / C-5
247Christensen & Wright (2011)Public service motivation on job choice: P-O Fit and P-J FitJ. Public Administration Research & Theory406linkR-1 / Scan
248Riordan et al. (2001)Pre-entry experiences and socialization tactics: Newcomer attitudes124A / R-4
249Goodman (2007)Focusing on the bodily felt sense: Tool for transactional analystsTransactional Analysis Journal6linkCoaching
250Wheeler et al. (2007)HRM effectiveness, intent to turnover: Supervisors and embeddednessPsycEXTRA Dataset81link事業中心人事 / C-3
251Beckhard & Harris (1977)Organizational transitions: Managing complex changeAddison-Wesley / Group & Organization Studies10linkB
252Smither et al. (2005)Does performance improve following multisource feedback? Meta-analysisPersonnel Psychology365linkK / C-1
253Bauer et al. (2024)New horizons for newcomer socialization: Review & meta-analysisJournal of Management35linkA / R-4
254Anthropic (2026)Labor market impacts of AI: A new measure and early evidenceAnthropic Research一次データlinkV / AI ネイティブ
255Korst, Puntoni & Tambe (2026)Managers and Executives Disagree on AI—and It's Costing CompaniesHarvard Business ReviewWharton n=800linkP / C-5 / 中間経営職
256Nature SR (2026)Integrating ML and explainable AI for employee attrition prediction (SHAP / XAI)Nature Scientific Reports2026 新規linkQ / R-5 / Orbit
257Ulrich (1997)Human Resource Champions: The Next Agenda for Adding Value and Delivering ResultsHarvard Business School Press推定 2,000+O / C-5 / 中間経営職 / HRBP 4 機能

さらに深く知りたい方へ

  • WhitePaper V10(Q4 公開予定)── 13 章 1,388 行の精緻化版で 130 件配置。理論背景を章ごとに解説。
  • 書籍『引力経営(仮)』2027 Q1 KDP 出版予定 ── 経営者一般向け解説。
  • Gravity Scan 無料 Web 診断 v2 ── 18 問 3 軸 3 分で自社の組織引力タイプを診断(自動 PDF + 30 分説明セッション同梱)。CODE × Scan で個人と組織を立体可視化。